|
A NOVEL DERMO-COSMETIC AGENT FOR TOPICAL APPLICATION IN ANDROGENIC HAIR
LOSS, i.e. EFFLUVIUM AND ALOPECIA
Our lives depend on our hormones. Of those, the sex
hormones, estrogens in women and androgens in men, are of major
importance on influencing almost every aspect of our physiology and
social life. The sex hormone levels physiologically change with age.
Thus, after levels of testosterone and its much more potent derivative,
dihydrotestosterone (DHT), peak in the twenties, a continuous decline is
observed throughout the remainder of life. In women, estrogen levels
peak in their twenties, and then slowly decline until menopause, where
the drop is sometimes drastic. Women also produce some male sex hormones
and inversely, men produce estrogens, initially in very small
quantities, but with years the levels increase until around 60, women
actually produce about as much male sex hormone as men at that age. As
it happens, it is the male hormones which are responsible for the most
usual form of hair loss in both men and women.
The relationship between the sex hormones and the scalp
hair is not yet fully understood. Early in life, estrogens in women and
androgens in males make scalp hair grow. Then, usually after 30, for
reasons not yet explained, in genetically predisposed males the
androgens start pushing the hair out of the follicles, thus causing hair
loss. A similar phenomenon occurs in women who have reached a stage in
their life when they also produce substantial levels of androgens. Hair
loss, which dermatologists call effluvium, ultimately results in
alopecia. There are also other reasons for alopecia which dermatologists
diagnose and often can treat, but by far the most prevalent is alopecia
caused by the male hormone and therefore called androgenic.
Testosterone by a small chemical modification normally
occurring in the body changes into an analog, the so-called
dihydroxytestosterone (DHT). As an androgen, this compound is much more
powerful. One approach to the treatment of hair loss, therefore, has
been to inhibit this conversion by a drug. Such a drug has been
developed and is currently marketed as Propecia. The effectiveness of
Propecia has been reported as varying from 30-50% in arresting hair
loss, but clearly there is a disadvantage of a chronic systemic
administration and the uncertainty of what changing basic physiological
mechanisms may cause. Although there are no such indications in the
current clinical studies, no one is certain what manipulation of the
normal hormonal turnover in the body will produce after extended use.
It has always been obvious to researchers that an agent
acting only on the skin and not penetrating into the body would be much
preferable for prevention of hair loss and/or restoration of hair
growth. There have been countless attempts to achieve this goal. One
drug originally developed to decrease blood pressure, minoxidil, was
found to induce upon longer use some hair growth, but only in the vertex
area. The efficacy was reported as somewhere around 30%; the effect was
attributed to a number of factors, most prominently an incidental
increase of blood flow in the scalp. Various vitamins, plant extracts
and other preparations were also developed, but none really could
overcome the essential effect of the male hormones affecting the hair
follicles.
It has been known for a long time that the male hormones
can act only after attaching themselves to a messenger, a small protein,
the so-called androgen receptor. The androgen receptors can be blocked
by certain drugs. These were developed for therapeutic purposes, among
others, to keep in check the cancer of the prostate, which squarely
depends upon the androgen hormones for its growth. These compounds are
given orally and are resorbed from the gut. They act directly by
blocking the androgen receptor. It should be noted that such
inactivation is always temporary since the cells of our body in their
daily cycles continuously manufacture the androgen receptor. Further,
there is the problem that androgen receptors are distributed throughout
our bodies and are also copious in the brain, where their blockade
invariably induces loss of interest in matters of sex, i.e., loss of
libido. When applied on the scalp these drugs either had no effect or
they were resorbed and passed into the body eliciting systemic side
effects. This is why none of these drugs were developed into a safe
dermo-cosmetic product to combat hair loss.
In an effort to develop a more powerful inhibitor of the
androgen receptor, the biomedical laboratories Biophysica in California,
in collaboration with the research laboratories of a Czech biotech
pharma company, Interpharma Praha, developed a new class of substances
which proved to render the androgen receptor inactive in a novel way. A
large number of new molecules were synthesized and tested. Some were not
resorbed when given orally or topically. The most promising molecule was
structurally modified so that minor amounts of water would cause the
molecule's decomposition, thus rendering it pharmacologically inactive
and incapable to act inside the body. To prove that this substance, now
called Fluridil, once resorbed into the skin would not enter into the
body, a number of experimental studies were conducted using rats and
rabbits, who are capable of taking up substances through their skin 6 to
10 times more than humans. We applied large quantities of Fluridil, far
surpassing the highest conceivable dose in humans. Using sophisticated
equipment of high sensitivity no trace of Fluridil or its fragments were
ever found in the blood.
Many studies were conducted to ascertain the systemic
and topical toxicity in animals and finally in human volunteers at the
specialized Experimental Dermatology Institute of the University of
California in San Francisco, under the leadership of Professor Howard
Maibach. The result of this study was remarkable in that no irritation
whatsoever was observed, thus confirming the data we previously gleened
from experimental animals.
By then, news had spread and several of our colleagues
of ours on their own started applying the compound to their scalp, soon
to report the unusual efficacy of the alcoholic solution of Fluridil. We
have thereafter optimized the composition of the solution, conducted all
required safety tests and after having presented our findings to the
authorities, gained marketing approval in the Czech Republic.
In a study with human volunteers, not even trace levels
of Fluridil were detected in the serum; therefore, it cannot be expected
to have systemic effects. This was also confirmed by the clinical study
conducted presently at the Medical School dermatology department
(Chairman: J. Bucek, M.D., Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic):
in most subjects, increase in anagens (growing hair) and decrease in
telogens (dying hair) after 3 months of daily application of 2 ml
Fluridil was substantial; there were no changes in the hematological and
hormonal profiles and there were no adverse effects.
From what has been said above, it is obvious that the
mechanism of Fluridil as a dermo-cosmetic device is sufficiently clear
to judge Fluridil's prospective usefulness. Surely, when hair has been
missing from the scalp for a long time and the hair follicles were
obliterated by the ingrowth of connective tissue, there is very little
chance for growing new hair. Here only transplants can reasonably work.
Fluridil is therefore useful only when the hair follicles are still
active and their androgen receptors are still intact.
So far, the most successful findings were reported by
volunteers who started using Fluridil at the time when the first loss of
hair was encountered. With men, this can start any time after 30 years
of age; with women very often the hair effluvium sometimes dramatically
and suddenly appears concurrently with menopause. In these clients we
find that the hair loss ceases after a few weeks of once-a-day
application.
Perhaps, unfortunately, but understandably based
on what had been said above, in order to keep the androgen receptor in
check it is necessary to continue applying Fluridil daily. In a number
of volunteers we found that after some 3 to 4 months of use, new hair
growth, "peach fuzz" - the appearance of baby hair - was
induced in the scalp, unless it had been hairless for many years. With
time and patience which the hair growth cycle requires - and which may
be as long as one year - we often observe a gradual transformation of
the "baby hair" into hair of normal appearance.
|